Home » Misc » Who am i most like quiz

Who am i most like quiz


Development of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz

This page serves as the manual for the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz, and the peer-report and couples-report version.

This page is under construction! Please check back someday for the polished version!

Background

When I, your author, would tell people that I published personality tests on the internet, I would often be asked if that meant that I worked for the website BuzzFeed writing their "Which _________ Character Are You?" personality quizzes. And I would have to reply that, no, I am more interested in science and human nature than entertainment; those quizzes are fun, but not that meaningful. And that is not a criticism of BuzzFeed! The value of BuzzFeed (and all other sources of which character tests) are proven by their popularity. They are fun games. People enjoy taking them: case closed. However, if you are interested in the question of how to make good psychological measures, I assumed they never offered much interesting to think about. I created this test in 2019 after I had the idea of representing each character as a vector, which could be populated by crowdsourced data. And it has actually given me a lot of interesting things to think about! So I slightly retract my previous prejudice against the idea of character personality.

An additional goal of this project has been to create a dataset that can be use in statistical research and education. I am imagining this dataset being great for teaching factor analysis or clustering algorithms. Because of this additional goal, the dataset has been designed to be much richer than would be needed just to create the quiz. For example, the number of features users rate characters on is much larger and more diverse.

Collecting the ratings of characters

Instead of the test creator deciding what each character's profile should be just based on their opinion, the opinions of a large number of people would be averaged to produce the character profiles.

The format of a 100 point scale was chosen that is anchored on either end by an adjective.

To start, the test dataset was populated with volunteers from reddit (starting with Game of Thrones and Harry Potter characters), but once a workable version of the test was operational, the database has been self sustaining with volunteers recruited from people taking the test. After a user has answered the personality rating survey but before they have viewed their results they are asked if they would be willing to rate some characters. There is about a 35% opt-in rate. Volunteers are then asked to select any fictional universes they know about from a list, and then the characters from that universe are paired with items from the set of features (usually randomly) and they rate them. Afterwards, a few more questions are asked about the user's relationship to that fictional universe and some demographic questions. They survey where the characters were rated has varied over time, but mostly has looked like the below screenshot.

The scale goes from 1 (far left) to 100 (far right). The user did not receive instruction on this in the rating survey, but during the body of the quiz they did use similar slider scales to rate themselves that did display the numerical values and so the user should have made the connection and had an understanding of what the scale was. The number of ratings a particular user would give has changed over time. Originally users were assigned to do 30 ratings, but this seemed to be too many so currently users are assigned to do 15 unless it for a universe where data is rare then they are assigned 25.

After this, a few questions that are to help evaluate that user's relationship to the work were asked, pictured below.

Then finally, some demographic questions were asked to put the sample in context, pictured below.

This was the last page of the volunteer survey and after it was submitted users were directed immediately to their results. This page also collected consent to use the user's data as its final question. Users who do not answer yes to this question have their data discarded.

Using this procedure, a very large number of ratings have been collected. The graph below shows number of completed surveys per day since this quiz was converted to the current workflow.

With each user providing up to 30 character ratings in one survey, a total of more than 69,496,000 ratings spread across 400 items for 1,750 characters have been made. These have been somewhat unequally distributed as the more commonly known universes receive more ratings, but care has been taken so that each item for every character in the database has received at least 3.

Generating the bipolar scales

The item format for the quiz and dataset was chosen to be a 1 - 100 scale anchored with text on both ends. This is not a super common format in psychological measurement, in fact rating scales with sliders have significant problems that I have previously criticized them for. The reason why this format was chosen was due to user experience considerations. To make how the quiz works understandable to users, the results page needs a graph, and the graph looks better with high granularity. If user responses were just on a 1 - 5 scale for example, a scatter plot made out of them would look very clumpy.

The items were generated by your author over time, until there were 400. This is far more items than actually can be used in the quiz. A 400 question quiz would be way to long. But having all these items allows us to evaluate and select the best performing items. This also makes the data set more useful for educational purposes.

One way to evaluate how good an item is just how good it seems. And this method is more or less how other character tests are made, the creator puts in questions that just seem good to them. As explained earlier, the judgment of many is better than the judgment of one. So here, this issue was crowsourced to test users in a survey that looked like below.

This survey was run until at least 500 people had given their opinion on each question. The questions with the highest and lowest average scores are below (4=Definitely include; 1=Definitely exclude).

Checking the reliability of user ratings

The premise of this quiz is that aggregating different user's ratings together increases their accuracy, but that is as assumption that could not be true. For example, if character personality is completely in the eye of the beholder and has no consistency across different raters than this the idea of any 'which character' personality quiz is pointless. This question is known as interrater reliability. It will only make sense to talk about a character being a certain way if people agree that the character is that way. This is usually quantified with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1). The value of ICC ranges from 0 to 1. With 0 being no agreement and 1 being perfect agreement. The 10 questions with the highest and lowest interrater reliability are in the table below.

Some questions were much more reliable that others. Some questions had very low reliability and looking at them, it makes sense. The low reliability items all do seem kind of confusing. The question that showed the lowest reliability is the contrast between being 'right-brained' and 'left-brained'. This question is a reference to the pop-psych personality idea that people prefer to use one side of their brain and that each side has specific functions. The low consistency of ratings made on this question matches up with my previous experience working with the idea. I attempted to create my own measure of being left-brain versus right-brain back in the day, and found that it was mostly an incoherent/meaningless idea. Everyone's definition of what they thought it meant to be left or right brain varied too widely to be useful at all. See Development of the Open Hemispheric Brain Dominance Scale.

We can graph the reliability of each question versus the average rating a question recived in the survey where users were asked what questions they thought should be used for the quiz. Some of the points have been labeled to help with interpretation.

The correlation between these was positive, but modest (r=0. 37). Looking at the individual points, we can see why this makes sense. Users were generally able to tell which questions were meaningless and agreed they should not be used in the test. Some questions were outliers, where it was reliable but still got low user approval. One of these was the item young (not old). It is the 2nd most reliable question, but got a very low user scores. And this make sense, users don't dislike this question because it is meaningless, they dislike it because its not about personality. So you can see how this demonstrates that is important for a question to be reliable, but reliability is not enough.

Causes of unreliability

Modeling the ratings of character personality

So, we have all these ratings of characters and we might want to ask, "what is the best model of a characters personality?" The dataset contains 400 values for each character, but probably some of these values are redundant? You could probably well describe characters with far less than 400 values per character. The typical analysis to do this in psychometrics is called factor analysis. Factor analysis tries to explain a larger set of observed values with a smaller set of fundamental causes.

When you run a factor analysis, the first thing you look at is the "scree plot". Factor analysis extract factors one at a time, each time trying to make the factor extracted do as much work as possible, so each sequential factor does less work than the previous. You can look at how much variance each factor explains and then kind of make a judgment call about how many are important. The scree plot from a factor analysis of the 400 values for 1,600 characters is below.

Interpreting a scree plot is more art than science, but I am going to say that I see 8 factors that appear to be doing work here. So for the rest of the analysis in this section I am going to only consider the first 8 factors extracted. A factor analysis computes the loading of each variable on each factor. The loading is what the analysis estimates the correlation of that variable with the factor is. So we can look at the variables with the highest loading to try and interpret what each factor "is". The table below shows the loadings of the top few items that load on each factor.

FeatureFactor loading
12345678
cruel (not kind)0.97-0.010.070.060.01-0.010.03-0.01
poisonous (not nurturing)0.960.12-0.030.050.02 -0.010.070.02
angelic (not demonic)-0.95-0.17-0.090.0200.01-0.05-0.02
scheduled (not spontaneous)0.04-0.920.040.17-0.170.0400.02
serious (not bold)0.01-0. 9-0.07-0.02-0.09-0.060.240
orderly (not chaotic)-0.28-0.870.180.21-0.06-0.05-0.050.01
noob (not pro)0.050.08-0.9-0.040.060-0.02-0.08
mighty (not puny)-0.06-0.020.90.010.190.030.07-0.08
badass (not weakass)-0.150.150.89-0.070.090.030.04-0.01
scruffy (not manicured)0.020.31-0.04-0.860.04-0.070.12-0.01
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)-0.310.050.01-0.830.160-0.02-0.03
proletariat (not bourgeoisie)-0. 40.090.05-0.820.0200.050.02
sporty (not bookish)0.130.360.18-0.210.84-0.02-0.04-0.03
nerd (not jock)-0.27-0.22-0.30.06-0.80.07-0.020.15
intellectual (not physical)-0.14-0.390.10.27-0.7900.030.14
leisurely (not hurried)-0.070.4500.01-0.01-0.77-0.18-0.1
sleepy (not frenzied)-0.29-0.24-0.25-0.16-0.02-0.740.1-0.04
aloof (not obsessed)-0.380.1-0.04-0.110.16-0.67-0.08-0.08
sad (not happy)0. 53-0.230-0.1-0.040.050.76-0.01
cheery (not sorrowful)-0.480.36-0.120.150.02-0.01-0.730.01
traumatized (not flourishing)0.38-0.02-0.26-0.2600.160.680.02
luddite (not technophile)0.090.04-0.07-0.190.18-0.060-0.91
high-tech (not or low-tech)-0.02-0.070.230.29-0.190.10.010.86

You can read the table and see that when describing characters, people talk about how cruel, spontaneous, mighty, scruffy, nerdy, high-energy, sad, and high-tech a character is and these descriptions are independent. And this maybe kinda and makes sense and seems kind of reasonable. However, I am partial to the phrase "factor analysis is uninterpretable" (stolen from Tal Yarkoni). I think results of a statistical analysis are only interpretable in the context of a theory and I have no theory of character personality — and, I don't think there could ever be one.

So rather than a scientific model, we will focus on the less ambitious goal of a predictive model. And the thing we will aim to predict is how much a user thinks they are like a specific character based on their their questionnaire answers. In a sense this will be like a recommendation engine that recommends users characters, and the criteria for good results is that the user agrees that the recommended characters are similar to them.

Exploring validity using height as a criterion

There is one trait where it might actually be reasonable to talk about a character having a true value of it. For characters played by actors (i.e. not animated, etc.), the actor who played that character has a measurable height and the description of being tall vs short (P69) can be said to be directly downstream from that. I scraped the height listed for actors on Imdb and cross referenced it with the ratings for their characters in our dataset:

The correlation between the actor's height as listed on IMDb and the tallness rating of their character in out dataset was correlated at r=0.693. And remember that the true value of the relation between these two things is higher than the calculated value because of unreliability. It value will get higher as more data is collected.

How the correlation increases with more ratings can be demonstrated with a simulation. Using the cases where there were at least 100 ratings (n=249), the effect of sampling only a certain number of ratings was investigated. The results are graphed below.

You can see that if a characters rating is only based on one rating, the correlation is r=0.544, but if its based on 100 rating, it jumps to r=0.751. The benefit of addition additional ratings is very large at the beginning, but after characters have 10 ratings for a trait the margin benefit of one more rating gets very small.

If you projected this out and imagined that an infinite number of ratings were collected (i.e. that the average of the ratings had no unreliability left in it), it looks like the trend is to approach r=0.76.

There is another sources of unreliability in the comparison that we need to acknowledge to. The heights as listed on IMDb do not appear to be perfectly accurate. Let's investigate one outlier on the graph:

Jessa Johansson from the TV show Girls has been rated by n=37 users on tall (not short) and the average was 67.2 (meaning somewhat towards the tall end of the scale). This character is played by actress Jemima Kirke who was listed on IMDb as being 5' 2" (1.57 m), which is quite short. So one of these values seems like they should be wrong. And so, when we look at sources other than IMDb, there does seem to be some disagreement out there. CelebWikiBiography.com says "Her height is 5 feet ­­2 inches or 5 feet 4 inches or 5 feet 5 inches".

We can compare her to Lena Dunham, a fellow actor in Girls. Dunham is listed on IMDb as being 5'3", an inch taller than they list Jemima Kirke! But in our data, Hannah Horovath gets 15.6/100 for tall compared to 67.2/100 for Jessa Johansson. If we look at photos of them side by side, Kirke (blue) does look a fair bit taller than Dunham (red).

So my conclusion is that Kirke probably is more like 5'5" and that the correlation between actual and rated height would be higher if IMDb was better at reporting actual heights.

It's hard to estimate how much having perfectly reliable height data would increase the correlation, but my guess is probably not that much (on average I expect IMDb to be pretty accurate). So we still have the question, why is the correlation not r=1 when correcting for unreliability? Isn't the idea of this test that if we average together people's ratings we get the "true score"?

This is where have to start considering the issue of what in psychometrics is called "measurement invariance". This will be the most challenging philosophical problem for this character matching system. Measurement invariance is when what seems to be the same measure (here, the same question) produces responses that have different meanings when used in different populations or different contexts. For example, when rating the height of characters short tall, there is a measurement invariance issue around the gender of the character. See the same graph we saw before now broken down by gender:

People use a different standard to decide whether a female character is tall than they use to decide for a male. This makes intuitive sense and you can probably recognize this in your own thinking: a woman 6 feet tall is very tall for a woman, so you might remark about how tall she is, but a man six feet tall is not particularly tall for a man. If you control for the gender of actor/character the correlation between actor height and rated character tallness increases from r=0.693 to r=0.749.

This idea of measurement invariance will be addressed much more in depth when we get to the section on tuning the algorithm. But for now, we can say having people rate characters does seem to be a reliable method, though not a perfectly valid one.

Predicting user-character similarity ratings

So, as we saw above there are philosophical issues with the idea of "you think you are an extrovert and people think Mr.Character is an extrovert, therefore you are like Mr.Character". So, let's try moving away from statistics and into data science, pure number crunching. Instead of a psychological assessment, let's try conceptualizing what we are doing as a recommendation engine with the target of maximizing user identification. The main tool used here is the question shown below:

Users who agreed at the end of the test to rate some characters to make the test better were directed to select from a list of fictional universes which ones they knew. Then they were shown a random assortment of characters from those universes and asked to rate how similar each was to them on a six point scale from 1=Extremely similar to 6=Extremely different (they could also skip a character if they did not know).

Using data from the self-character similarity survey, a selection of items was tuned to maximize the correlation between match score with character and users self-identification with character. Its performance is graphed below.

Scoring

The current active version provides match scores that range from 0-100. To produce that score, the correlation is computed between the average rated scores for each character and the self ratings provided by the user. This correlation ranges between -1 and 1, so to turn it into a percent, 1 is added to that number and multiplied by 50. The mean difference algorithm takes the average difference between a users score and the characters scores and subtracts that from 100. Scores on the versions of the test with more questions tend to be lower for the best matching character that the versions with less. The more criteria you have, the more difficult it is to find a perfect match.

Comparison of others method of matching characters

Now that we have made and validated this matching system, we should put it in context by comparing it to other similar systems.

Myers-Briggs Personality Types

There are thousands of 'which character' quizes on the internet but they are not usually taken seriously enough to provide any information about how they work. But there is one alternative method of matching people to characters we can make a detailed comparison with: Myers-Briggs personality types. Myers-Briggs, or Jungian type, is a system of 16 personality types. It is the most popular system on the internet, and one of the common uses of the system is to type fictional characters. A common format is for someone to make a chart of the characters from a fictional universe and pick out one example they think fits each each of the 16 types. This usually looks like the meme below which shows a typing of Star Wars characters (from Entertainment Earth News):

The implication of these memes is that you should use your personality type to look up what character is similar to you. It is assumed that if you identify as an INFP, you then must have the most connection to the character that has been chosen as an example of an INFP, etc.

The question for us here is, can we quantify how well does this work? And, can we compare how well this works versus matching people to characters using the SWCPQ questionnaire?

The website Personality Database (PDB) functions somewhat similar to this website. Users rate characters on their Myers-Briggs and Enneagram personality types and these are all combined into a community verdict. PDB is the most popular Myers-Briggs community typing website, and its verdicts will be used in this analysis as the key for what type each character is under the Myers-Briggs system. Of the 1,600 character profiles in the SWCPQ1.0 dataset, there are 1,537 with matching profiles on PDB.

The validation survey run here also asked for a user's Myers-Briggs type, so we can cross reference these two datasets to see how well matching an individual to a character based on Myers-Briggs type works. First we will start with analyzing just one character at a time to illustrate how this works, then afterwards move on to analyzing all characters at once to compare the two methods.

Two of the characters with the most data in the validation dataset are Anna of Arendelle and Hermione Granger. For each of them we have many thousand people who both self-reported a Myers-Briggs type and rated how similar they were to the character. The graphs below shows what percent of each Myers-Briggs type gave each different rating of similarity to them.


We can see that when we categorize people by Myers-Briggs type, not all types have the same relation to the characters. People who identified as ENFP were most likely to say they were like Anna and people who identified as ESTJ were most likely to say they were similar to Hermione Granger. And if we go on personality database we see that those are the exact types that people have voted for Anna and Hermione! So, does this prove that the Myers-Briggs types are legit? My position is that Myers-Briggs type theory / Jungian psychology is pseudoscience, but the 16 types can be used as adjectives and describing things with adjectives is a reasonable thing to do. Indeed, Francis Galton counted more than a thousand words in the dictionary that could be used to describe people, and we can say Myers and Briggs added 16 more. They question to ask is how useful are these adjectives, how much work do they do?

Yes, 90% of ISTJs thought they were some degree of similar to Hermione, but the majority of the ESFPs (the type that thought that the least) still thought that.

So that looks like it checks out. PDB says Anna is an ENFP and self identified ENFPs are one of the types most likey to think they are similar to Anna. But also see that it is far from perfect. Some ENFPs did not think they were similar to Anna, and many people from all of the other types thought they were.

But that was just one character. We want to know how the system performs across all characters. There were 407 characters in the validation dataset that had at least 50 votes on Personality-Database.com, this analysis will only use those. In total 57,774 users provided a total of 718,995 ratings. The graph below shows how those ratings differed between when the user's type and the character's type matched, versus when they did not.

When a user's type matched the characters type, the user thought the character was similar to them 58.8% of the time versus 44.0% of the time when the types did not match. So matching to characters based on Myers-Briggs type does better than chance, but does not compare very well to how well this tool performs. Go back and look at the graph of how well match scores from this questionnaire predict whether or not a user will rate a character as similar to them: when a user matched to a character at the lowest level, there was a less than 10% chance they would think that the character was similar to them, versus an 80% chance when the matching score was at the high end.

But, that the MBTI would not function that well at matching people to characters is no suprise. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was designed to recommend careers, not characters. One specific example of how this effects things is that the Myers-Briggs types were designed to all have positive descriptions. This means they don't really convey information about goodness and badness very well. And goodness and badness is the most important thing people seem to base their judgments about how similar a character is to them on. Given that matching characters was not the purpose that the Myers-Briggs personality types were developed for, the fact that they do not perform well at it does not really debunk the idea of the 16 types directly. But many people on the internet have suggested that looking up what characters have the same type as you is highly meaningful. I would point to this as another example of the common phenomenon where people dramatically overestimate how useful categorizing by Myers-Briggs types is.

CharacTour

There is a different website with a tool pretty similar to this one called CharacTour. It also has a database of characters and a quiz that searches for matches. A comparison between them has been organized on Reddit, which uses what I think is a good method. The redditors would take both the CharacTour quiz and our quiz pretending to be a specific fictional character. Whichever quiz ranked the character they were pretending to be higher up in its results page (after correcting for total number of options) was considered the winner of that match up. A total of 15 redditors participated and the results were reported as "11 wins for OpenPsychometrics and 4 wins for CharacTour" (see the thread on r/SampleSize). This suggests that the quiz on this website has a better matching procedure, though an n=15 is too small for me to make any super specific claims about.

Resources

The data from the surveys used to develop is available for download.

Which Three Fictional Characters Make Up Your Personality?

Advertisement

Hold tight!

Working our magic...

Get your results & other quizzes sent to your inbox!

Please, be patient, your results are being generated!

Hold tight!

Working our magic. ..

Save all future quiz results by signing in!

(you won’t lose your spot!)

Please, be patient, your results are being generated!

As all your friends have been posting which three characters they are, you’re probably having trouble deciding which three you are. Don’t worry — just take this quiz to find out which combination of fictional characters resembles your personality! Because we are complex human beings, there usuallShow More

As all your friends have been posting which three characters they are, you’re probably having trouble deciding which three you are. Don’t worry — just take this quiz to find out which combination of fictional characters resembles your personality! Because we are complex human beings, there usually isn’t just one fictional character that we are perfectly aligned with in every way. You may have the silly optimism of Linda Belcher but the outgoing nature of Spongebob Squarepants and the determination and drive of Leslie Knope. You deserve to know which combination of three characters fits perfectly with your perfect personality (which is perfect because you are perfect!). All you have to do is answer 12 simple personality questions to get your result! We will ask you about your daily habits and drink preferences, how you handle conflict and your political beliefs. Each of your answers helps us get a picture of just who you are!

Show Less

NEXT QUESTION BELOW

1

You’re new in town and got invited to a house party. You arrive and don’t see anyone you know. Who is the first person you approach?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Whoever looks loneliest.
  • Preferably no one.
  • The best-looking person there.
  • Whoever looks most useful.

2

Your friends are having a disagreement.

What’s more important?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • I get my way
  • Everyone is happy
  • Making a decision and moving on

3

An overpowering thirst comes over you. What’s the best quencher?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Dry gin martini
  • Bourbon, straight-up
  • Diet Coke
  • Green tea
  • Strawberry smoothie
  • Water

4

Immigration is always a big issue in politics. What’s your opinion?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • They take our tax dollars and shoot all the jobs.
  • Immigrants are the backbone of America!
  • As long as they’re nice people, I don’t mind.

5

It’s Sunday night and you have to prepare for the week ahead. What are you doing?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Plotting how to manipulate people to get what I want.
  • Planning each day’s outfit, meal, and schedule.
  • Enjoying whatever freedom I have until it ends.
  • Relaxing with a stiff one.
  • Sharing a delicious meal with my family.

6

Speaking of planning for outfits, do you actually put effort into what you wear?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Of course! Got to look your best everyday.
  • When something special is going on.
  • If bending down to pick clothes up off the floor is effort, then yes.

7

It's easy to choose three fictional characters to show your personality.

But which real-life celebrity would you throw into the mix?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Vladimir Putin

  • Burt Reynolds

  • Anna Kendrick

  • Helen Mirren

8

We can’t all be “amazing.” Which “A” word best describes you?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Amicable
  • Ambitious
  • Adventurous
  • Antisocial
  • Admirable
  • Alpha

9

It’s Friday night and you decide to treat yourself to a dinner out. What are you in the mood for?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Burger

  • Foie gras

  • BBQ ribs

  • Tacos

10

Getty

You moved into a new apartment and the landlord says you can have only one pet.

Which one do you choose?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

11

This glass is…

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Half full
  • Half empty
  • An opportunity

12

There’s a beauty pageant being held in your town, and the prize is a lot of money! Do you throw your name in?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • Have you seen me! I’d win a beauty pageant, hands down.
  • Pageants are stupid and demeaning.
  • My best friend is competing. I’ll root for her!
  • If I were female, of course.

13

Last question - how would you rate this quiz?

Ready? Scroll down to answer

  • I loved it!
  • It was pretty okay.
  • Not great…

Ready for another quiz?

Advertisement

Advertisement

You have subscribed successfully

Quiz: Do I love him

The line between falling in love and love is quite thin and barely perceptible. Therefore, having met a new man or feeling problems with a long-term partner, a woman may begin to doubt: do I love him? The test will tell you if you are experiencing true love or if this is a temporary attraction. What is the name of the feeling you are experiencing right now? How strong is it, resistant to life's difficulties and time?

1. Who is this man to you?

The source of your happiness.

Ideal, the best thing that could happen to you.

An ally with whom you would like to overcome the difficulties of life together.

One of the many variants of fate.

2. You went to the store together to buy you a dress. After inspecting the goods, it turned out that you and your chosen one chose two different options. And each of you is not satisfied with the choice of the other. How will you do it?

Buy both to please yourself and him.

Buy the dress he likes. You want to always be the most beautiful in his eyes.

Buy the dress you like best. After all, it's up to you to wear it.

Go to another store to find a dress that both of you will like.

3. Your former partner invited you to a business meeting and promises you a good job offer. Your current man doesn't like it. He asks you not to go. How will you do it?

You will go no matter what. This is a very profitable meeting, and you are not going to lose the chance just because someone is too jealous.

Go to the meeting, but don't tell the guy so you don't upset him.

Don't go because you don't want to do anything that might upset your boyfriend a little.

Explain that this is a good chance and offer to go together so that your man is less nervous.

4. You and your boyfriend have the only day off of the week. You want to go to the cinema to see the premiere of a new melodrama, and he wants to go to the decisive football match. You don't like each other's ideas. Where will you end up going?

For a football match. You really want to please your loved one and will do everything to make him feel good with you.

You won't go anywhere. If you can't come to an agreement, then it's better to spend time together at home.

Persuade the chosen one to go to the cinema, because you have wanted it for so long, and this is also a premiere!

Everyone will go where they want, and in the evening, devote time to each other.

5. What do you think about the shortcomings of your man?

You think that he will change for the better as soon as his feelings become more serious or you move on to the next stage of the relationship (cohabitation, marriage or the birth of a child, for example).

You are sure that your man has no minuses and he is always right.

You try to accept all the negative traits of a man, because no one is perfect.

You do not like some of the qualities of your chosen one, because of which you sometimes quarrel, but in general you are optimistic about everything.

6. Your best friend didn't like your man very much. She hints that it would be better for you to leave. What is your reaction?

Seriously think about her words and begin to look more carefully at the acquaintance or move away from him.

Fight with her because your boyfriend is very nice. And in general, she most likely just sunk into him herself and wants to beat him off.

Try to convince your friend that she is wrong, list the pluses of your chosen one.

Gently tell her that this relationship concerns only you and your man, and you will solve your problems yourself.

7. He had a bad day and took it out on you. What is your reaction?

You will justify him and try to please him so that he feels better as soon as possible.

Silently slam the door. You don't have to listen to it.

Let it cool down and then calmly ask what's wrong.

You will burst into tears or start shouting at him in response, because you are offended.

8. Can you admit the thought of cheating on your man?

If you're in trouble, you'll be happy to try your luck with another guy.

No, you think that betrayal is below your dignity.

No, you are afraid to even imagine betrayal towards him. He's the very best.

Only if he changes you or hurts you very badly.

9. You had an argument with a work colleague and now you are in a bad mood. Who will you first tell about the problem?

Either a man or a girlfriend - depending on who you see first or who calls first.

Not to my boyfriend. He has enough problems of his own and you don't want to bother him.

A friend or mother, because they understand you best.

To my man. You always share things like that with him and tell each other about how your day went.

10. He forgot about the anniversary of your acquaintance and came home without a present. What do you think?

A little upset, but remind him of the date and offer to decide together how to spend the rest of the evening to celebrate the anniversary.

You are not particularly offended, because, to be honest, you yourself forgot about it.

Decide that it's your fault, because you didn't remind him, and he's been so busy lately and generally tired.

Take offense. How could you forget such a day?!

11. There is nothing to eat at home, your man is hungry, and you are exhausted after work and do not want to cook dinner. How will you do it?

Do nothing. If he is hungry, he may well cook something for himself.

Do something very easy on a quick hand so as not to disappoint your boyfriend.

You're going to cook anyway. Your man should always be fed.

Offer to order takeaway or dine at a cafe.

12. Imagine that you don't like his friends. What will you do?

You think that such a situation is impossible on its own, because he chooses the best.

You will often point out to him that his friends are a bad influence on him, and you wish him the best.

You will say this directly and avoid meeting them.

Say that you don't really like his friends, but he has the right to decide with whom he communicates and with whom he does not.

13. Would you like children from him?

Perhaps, but not now.

Yes, but if he does not want children, then you will sacrifice your desire and refuse this idea.

Yes, you think he will be a good father.

No.

14. Can you remember how your feelings for him developed from the very first meeting?

You looked at him for a while, trying not to rush things.

From the very first sight you felt that this is your man, and fell in love.

Nothing special, just got to know each other or you don't remember.

At first you tried to get to know him better, but when feelings appeared, you went into these emotions with your head.

15. He swore he would call you at lunchtime. It's almost evening and still no call. Your thoughts?

Be offended because he didn't keep his promise.

Well, I didn't call, so I didn't call. You will quickly forget, as you have enough things to do.

You will think that he just got busy and forgot. Call him yourself.

You will be very worried. Did something happen to him? Or is he offended by you for something?

16. Did you tell your parents about him?

Yes, but not immediately, but when your feelings become more serious.

No, and you haven't thought about doing it yet.

Yes, you immediately said that you had met the man of your dreams.

Yes, but rather because you tell them everything.

17. Your man has a bad cold, and you have to hand in an important project at work today. How will you do it?

You will go to work, but you will write or call all the time and worry about how he is there without you.

Try to get time off from work. If it doesn't work out, then hand over the project, and then take off early and buy drugs on the way home.

What job?! Of course, you will stay with your loved one and will court him all day.

Go to work. He's a big boy, he can heal himself.

18. Imagine that he has made the decision to leave you. How will you react?

Get upset, but soon forget about it. The sea is still full of fish.

It will be hard for you to come to your senses, but you will thank him for everything that was, and try to move on.

You feel like life is over and no longer makes sense.

You will have a tantrum, you will try to do your best to keep him close to you.

19. Your man has bought glasses that he really likes, but clearly does not fit. Will you point it out?

Yes. You want to help him look his best.

No, you are very afraid of offending him.

Yes, you understand that you will be ashamed next to him in such glasses.

No. Your man has impeccable taste.

20. Do you have secrets from your man?

Not at all. If you didn’t say something, it means that you simply didn’t remember or there was no right moment.

Yes, everyone has skeletons in their closet.

No, you think you have to tell him absolutely everything, even though you let him have his secrets.

Yes, you don't talk about certain things so as not to disturb your loved one.

Quiz: Who do you like more than people or animals?

published PopTesti.ru

Each person is unique. Are all creatures the same? Find out who you love more with this fun quiz: animals or people!


or share:
Subscribe to news in VKontakte , Odnoklassniki and Telegram

Like it?

250 Points

Yes No

excotest

Do not miss

  • Can we guess what grades you got in school?

    Today my child got two A's for the first time in his first grade. two butterflies in a diary! Yes, yes, in our school, instead of the usual grades […] More

  • How spoiled and vulgar are you?

    Sometimes what we see in pictures is not what is actually there. This is directly related to our psychology. The human brain processes the image and […] More

  • How open are you?

    Are you an absolutely honest and sincere person, or do you hide your true emotions even when you are alone? Want to check if you can be called a straightforward person? Then go […] More

  • What is your highlight?

    We are all alike, but each has its own personality. Every person has their own peculiarity, which can be called a "zest". After all, no two people are exactly alike. At […] More than

  • Answer 5 questions and we'll reveal your biggest fear

    Fears are a natural response to danger or the unknown, but they can also reflect our inner desires and needs. Some of us are afraid of conflict and […] More

  • Are you a synesthetic?

    Synesthesia - the ability to draw analogies between signals from different senses (see numbers in color, hear shapes, etc.) - is considered the privilege of geniuses: from […] More

  • Is empathy innate in you?

    To feel the pain of another person, to pass it through oneself is a test that changes a person from the inside. Are you familiar with this condition? We invite you to find out and […] More

  • A test that will check if you are a psychopath?

    Each of us hides skeletons in our closet. Some secrets can be called petty pranks, others can shock the public. This test should not be taken […] More

  • What will you be like when you are old?

    With age, the nature of many of us changes. Everyone wants to know in advance what awaits us in old age and how we will spend these years of our lives.

    Learn more